Wins 1,017 Domains in Largest Ever UDRP

November 13, 2009

The National Arbitration Forum (NAF) published a historic domain dispute decision late Thursday awarding 1,017 cybersquatting domain names to The complaint was filed by, owner of, through a process called the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP), and is believed to be the largest case in the ten years since the UDRP was first enacted. The complete decision is available here.

Interestingly, was represented in the case by a company called CitizenHawk, Inc., which is not a law firm as would be typical. CitizenHawk and other similar firms such as Alias Encore, Inc. specialize in the automated creation of UDRP complaints using proprietary software, enabling brand holders to enforce their trademark rights at an otherwise infeasible scale.

“The exhibits for this UDRP would have been thousands of pages long, making the case nearly impossible to construct manually,” said Graham MacRobie, CEO of Alias Encore. “Companies have been playing a losing game of Whac-A-Mole with cybersquatters for years, and this case serves as an excellent demonstration of the role automation can play in leveling the playing field by going after huge chunks of infringing names at once.”

Representatives for and CitizenHawk were not reached for comment.

The disputed domain names were all slight misspellings of (such as, or they included FreeCreditReport spelled correctly within a longer domain (such as The respondent in the case is a firm called Netcorp LLC which had previously lost one other UDRP case in 2005. Unlike that previous case, Netcorp chose this time to represent itself rather than engage the services of a domain industry attorney such as Ari Goldberger or John Berryhill – an interesting and perhaps telling decision considering the complexity of the case.

Further complicating the case was a tussle over the perceived “generic” nature of the brand Netcorp argued that “the disputed domain names are comprised of common, descriptive terms and as such cannot be found to be confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark.” Ultimately, NAF’s panelist deferred to the United States Patent and Trademark Office which had previously reviewed and approved’s trademark application.

It would seem that this decision sets or reinforces a fairly strong precedent that trademark holders may be entitled to, not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark, but also to a wide swath of other domain names including nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark, potentially even if the trademark is comprised of generic words.


One Response to “ Wins 1,017 Domains in Largest Ever UDRP”

  1. Domain Name Wire » News » Linking Automated UDRP Filers CitizenHawk and Alias Encore - The Domain Industry's News Source on November 16th, 2009 8:33 am

    [...] through Slashdot over to a company called Alias Encore. Alias Encore had written about the win and noted that CitizenHawk represented in the case: Interestingly, [...]

Got something to say?

Typosquatting Scan


Some websites have just a few misspelled domain names siphoning revenue away from them. Others have hundreds or even thousands. Enter a .com domain name to see a list of infringing sites along with screenshots.

Meet Us in New York!

Affiliate Summit East 2014 is taking place from August 10th - 12th at the New York Marriott Marquis in New York, NY.

We'll be there and we'd love to meet you. Click here to set up an appointment by email.